Letter from JOSEPH TORREY to GEORGE PERKINS MARSH, dated November 26, 1848.
Primary tabs
To the Hon' George P. Marsh,
Dear Sir,
We have experienced all along, and begin to experience more and more every day, the evils of trying to manage a College without a head. To be sure, we are not much worse off than when we had a President who was most of the time absent, or necessarily occupied with there cares than those of the College--not much worse off I mean so far as it concerns the administration of the internal affairs of the institution. But we were bad enough off then--now we are without a head even in name, which gives us a bad reputation abroad, and is working disastrously to the interests of the University in every point of view.
On this matter, however, I need not dwell in writing to you. The faculty, feeling
these evils deeply, and seeing no sign of a movement to provide any remedy for them
on the part of the Corporation, have felt it incumbent on them to take such
initiatory steps as they could consistently do in a matter of this sort, which does
not seem properly to belong to their province--at least to proceed so far as to
inquire whether there was any person within the circle of their acquaintance
possessed of the qualifications which seem requisite for the arduous and responsible
post now vacated, and who could probably be induced to accept it by any
considerations which we have to offer.
After long and careful inquiry, which has
occupied a great part of the time we could find for discussing such matters in our
weekly meetings, the faculty have at last come to an opinion in which they are
unanimous, and in which they have the concurrence also of Prof. G.
W. Benedict, with whom as an old and tried officer of the institution we
have thought proper, after our own minds were made up, to consult. And they have
requested me now at this stage of the business to ask your own opinion and advice,
since on your judgment in a case of this sort, we should all place the greatest
reliance. The person whom we propose as the most suitable, taking all things into
account, to fill the vacant office of President of the University, is the
Rev Mr Worcester of this town. He is a graduate of Dartmouth, was some
time tutor there, has had other experience as an instructor, is a good scholar,
possesses a large & liberal mind, uncommon resolution of will & firmness
united with suavity & gentleness, knowledge of men, tact and prudence. All these
qualities he has shown; also a love of labor, a readiness to encounter difficulties
when they must be met, and an ability to conquer them or get round them. But you
know the man, though perhaps you may never have thought of him in this relation.
Having so good a man near at hand, with many of the essential qualifications we
seek, is it worth while to look
abroad in quest of a man of greater name and
pretensions perhaps, but of whom we and the community around us may know in truth
but little. There is no man, I feel confident, of all those whom I have as yet heard
mentioned, who would be likely to enjoy to a greater degree the confidence of our
religious public generally. Mr Worcester is a native of the state, of a good and
well-known stock, and has never that I know of been suspected of ,
Coleridgean or any other. My firm conviction of his prudence emboldened me to
suggest the thing to him, assuring him, however, that I did it without the least
authority. He received it as I expected he would. I have seen him once since, when
on my suggesting that I should write to you, he expressed great satisfaction and
remarked that your opinion, if unfavorable, would enable him to decide the matter at
once. I pray it may not be so. I build strong hopes on our being enabled to go on
prosperously with this gentleman at our head. So do we all. This appointment would
relieve us of a world of anxiety. We see difficulties in the way of it; the
attachment of his people to him, possible opposition from members of the
corporation, getting his name before them c c But with your good help, provided
always that you think as we do about it, all these difficulties can be overcome. I
need not say how anxious we are that the movement, at this immature stage, should be
kept private; and that if any thing further is
done about it, it may be removed
entirely out of the hands of the faculty. All the liberty we can possibly claim in a
case of this sort is simply to suggest the person in whom we ourselves would have
confidence, and whom we think capable of managing the affairs of the institution,
and who could be obtained. Having, then, taken this liberty, which we feel that
under the existing circumstances, you at least will excuse us in, we ask you to give
us your advice with your accustomed frankness, and as early as you can conveniently
do so--and in case you think favorably of the man, propose to us some methods of
getting the nomination made to the Corporation in a proper and suitable manner.
I was very sorry to learn, after you left this place, that you was called away by the illness of you wife. I hope to hear in your answer to this, that she is better.
Very sincerely your friendand humble servantJ. Torrey.
References in this letter:
George Wyllys Benedict, a professor of science at the University of Vermont, shared with Marsh an interest in botany and politics. He was a member of the state senate but lost in his bid to become railroad commissioner because of railroad lobby opposition.
An ordained minister and professesor of Ancient Languages and Philosophy, Professor Joseph Torrey (1797-1867) served as the president of the University of Vermont from 1862-1866. During his term, the university was faced with a multitude of hardships, including a financial crisis, which resulted from the fact that so many students left the university for military service. Torrey was the last theologian to serve as the president of the University of Vermont, when in 1865, UVM was designated as the land-grant institution of Vermont and became The University of Vermont and State Agricultural College.