» «.4. . ~ 1 .. \ r, _,»l ,._«:~.‘;~;. .-.. ll-F-M-T-F B-I-ll-Ii-0 WEST BRATTLEBORO — The second annual Bingo, an evening of camp, candor, and fabulous prizes to benefit Vermont Freedom to Marry Task Force, will be held on May 29 at the West Village Meeting House in West Brattleboro. This fundraiser will help to offset costs of Vermont Freedom to Marry Task Force’s education- al work in southern Vermont and throughout the state. The group regularly provides speakers and panelists to forums and panels across the state. Callers Mark Herman (aka Mama) and Bill McDanie|s wrru FILES FROM CAROLYN ASHBY long—awaited and contro- Aversial report on diversity at Middlebury College is garnering mixed reactions from students, faculty, and stafi. On March 29, the President’s Office at Middlebury College released the Human Relations Committee Diversity Report. The Committee, which met twice weekly from September I998 through January I999, examined issues brought up by student protests in April I998. The report discusses and makes specific recommendations in [2 areas of college life, includ- ing admissions and financial aid, curriculum, faculty recruitment, housing, spiritual life, and admin- istrative leadership. Based on interviews with indi- viduals, student organizations and other colleges, and previous College reports, it calls for the cre- ation of both an office and a dean handling diversity matters, curric- ular changes, and non-permanent ‘special interest’ suites in student residences. German professor Roman Graf was “very confident that the report will be received and responded to in a positive and active way.” Spanish instructor Miguel Fernandez told the Middlebury campus paper on April 20 that feedback so far has been positive. “The recommendations in the report are ‘do-able.’ What we have suggested has real substance.” Not everyone agrees. Mary Duffy, Women’s Studies Coordinator, felt “it is a strong document and address many important issues frankly,” but “the effect may seem muted, certainly some criticisms could be made in ,. stronger terms.” Former Middlebury student Russell Plato believed that instead of making powerful recommenda- tions and facilitating change, the HRC succumbed to political pres- sure and narrow focus. His specific criticisms included _':ffrx’r'_~,:l_i\‘r'_I '~:- ‘ is "v S — 001‘ IN THE MOUNTAINS i—iIi\-/l'AY 'Q (Kitty) will combine camp and quick wit to create a fun-filled evening for everyone. Many folks will recognize them from their shows at the Rainbow Cattle Co. as well as from their help with Bingo last year. Area business have donated prizes including overnight stays at the Saxtons River Inn and Chester House Inn, office visits at Brattleboro Naturopathic Clinic and Saxtons River Family Chiropractic, windshield wiper blades, seedling flowers and veg- etables and gift certificates to‘ many local stores and service providers. Doors open at 7pm. Admission is $10 and includes 10 lack of effort by some committee members to include GLBT issues in the process, “snobbish” neglect of socioeconomic issues except in cases of students of color, and tactless and unnecessary accom- modation of the administration. “It lies when it talks about Middlebury’s past progress and commitment to diversity.” Although an acknowledged active participant in the process, Plato was not appointed to the committee. Neither was Kevin Moss, Professor of Russian and faculty advisor to the GLBT stu- dent group for the last decade. “I was one of the first to hear [the HRC] was being reconstituted, and one of the first to submit an application [but was] not appoint- ed to the core group.” In fact, many felt those who were more outspoken were passed over for “people who wouldn't stir things up too much,” and were instead placed on the secondary ‘resource’ committees. College President McCardell maintained tha “this committee must be broadly representative of the student, faculty, and staff, if its recommendations are to have credibility. Thus, I did not limit appointments to those who expressed an interest.” The primary demand at the April 29, I998 -protest was a diversity affairs ofiice “dedicated to addressing the needs of students of color; gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender students; non-tradi- tional students; international stu- dents; students from differing eco- nomic and cultural backgrounds; and differently-abled students.” Consulting schools such as . Williams, Amherst, Dartmouth, and Swarthmore, the committee found that Middlebury was the only one without such an ofiice or cultural center. The report accord- ingly recommends “an Office of Diversity Affairs‘ in the new Student Center with a staff to work with cultural organizations [and] be the hub of the wheel of diversity programs and activities occurring across campus.” chances at prizes. There will be light snacks and beverages avail- able. All are welcome, but advised to come early, as seating is limited. ‘ Ileln Throw the lifeline CONCORD, NH — The Gay Info Line of New Hampshire is seek- ing distribution help with its directory of resources for the GLBT community of VT and NH. The Gay Lifeline directory, the result of more than a year’s work, will be available in late May. More than 400 social groups, accommodations, therapists, lawyers, intemet sites, and gay bars are listed and described in the volume. Because the information in the directory is time sensitive, the GIL is looking for individuals and groups to distribute directo- ries at events and bars. Alternative retail outlets are also encouraged to participate. Boxes of directories will be. available at discounts off the $5 cover price, and the GIL will cover shipping and handling. For more information, contact the organization at 603-224-1686 or email gayinfonh@a0l.c0m. EIIGS on the Prize HINESBURG — The Samara Foundation of Vermont received to Iliuersitv llenort Noting that “the administration does not mirror the composition of the community” a fact that “pre- sents a visual contradiction to its stated values,” the report also pro- poses creation of a new position. The dean of institutional diversity would possess full faculty creden- tials, oversee diversity matters regarding faculty and curriculum, work to resolve politically ' charged events, and visibly repre- sent the administration’s commit- ment to and understanding of issues of race, class, ethnicity, gender, sexuality, and disabilities Calling this “the most radical proposal in the report,” Graf emphasized its, importance in implementing visual strategies to create a diverse campus. “Diversity has to be integral to the campus, not just the Campus Center. Walking onto campus, one should immediately feel one is in a multicultural environment.” Student David Gramling also believed these points to be key. “Diversity of students is fast out- pacing the administration’s ability to interpret and serve that diversi- ty on a policy level,” he said. “We’re doing better in demo- graphics, but that is maskedtby a » «lack of public representation of those cultures.” » In response to complaints fro students — mostly female and/or GLBT —— who feel unsafe in resi- dence halls, recommendations advocate considering a way to gauge openness to having a GLBT roommate, providing more single rooms for freshmen, and provid- ing on-request non-permanent ‘special interest’ suites within the dorms. This last recommendation dis- appointed ‘advocates of the Gender Studies House as a penna- nent residential and educational space for the GLBT community. Former Student Government Association President and Community Council member Bryan Stratton wanted something “more positive toward the Gender Studies House. [‘Special interet’ suites within dorms] isn’t the letters of inquiry from 18 GLBTA organizations requesting a total of $120,000 in grants this spring. Eleven of those organizations have received invitations to sub- mit full grant proposals to the committee by May 10. The foundation was pleased by the response to the request for letters of intent for its first com- petitive grant cycle, but can’t ful- fill all the requests. “We have between $15,000 and $20,000 to grant this year, so the process is still competitive,” says Bill Lippert, ‘Samara’s executive director. They hope to announce the results of the selection process by July 1, 1999.7 Committee (HRC) on difference of all kinds Affairs Office McCardell Spring l998...The Controversy Begins April 1 April Fool’s Day issue of The Campus contains racially offensive ad, which also contains the word “pansy” April 8 President McCardell sends letter to community announcing the ad hoc reconstitution of the Human Relations April 13 Rally held to protest “silencing” of students based A April 19 Rutland Herald prints front-page article “Middlebury Struggles with Gay Issues” April 29 Protest organized by Student Coalition for Community to demand the establishment of Diversity May 11 Appointments to HRC announced by President answer. Creating an atmosphere which allows for group identity while maintaining a str“ong sense of community is what is needed.” There were also strong criti- cisms of the curricular, faculty recruitment, and student and fac- ulty retention recommendations. Despite assertions by Dean of the Faculty Robert Schine and HRC Chair Arlinda Wickland that “the curriculum is the most potent tool at our disposal for teaching about [diversity], ” none of the 20 offi- cial recommendations and sugges- tions specifically address GLBT cunicular content in the, gay and lesbian studies, or ways to attract and retain GLBT faculty and staff. Chaplain Laurel Macaulay Jordan pointed out that time kept the committee from accomplish- ing everything it might have. “There were always more things that we thought about doing or including...but we had to recog- nize how long the document was getting and how close to the dead- line we were.” Perhaps the strongestconcem is not about the report’s content, but its use. Student Kate Landis worried that “it’s under the rug in the sense that now it’s on paper, and to Middlebury, that’s as good as gone.” Similar reports in 1968, 1982, 1987, and I991 made the same recommendations regarding racial diversity, but despite ‘significant steps in 1992, enough continuing discomfort was felt to put it on the table again in 1999. The report itself acknowledges tha “many god ideas, innovative programs, and valuable reports are generated at the College, but we seem to lose track of them.” Many, including Leroy Nesbitt, _,«Special Assistant to the President for Minority Affairs, have echoed Mary Duffy’s sentiment that “the most important element in this process now is the College’s com- mitment in terms of resources, ‘ personnel and willingness to open various systems to a strong shot of diversity and prejudice reduction training.” In a letter to the community accompanying the report, President McCardell vowed that it would “not gather dust on a shelf of interesting institutional histori- cal documents. Rather, I mean for it to shape our actions on matters of diversity in the years to come.” So far, that promise is intact. The committee has held three »