Gay Bv KEVIN Moss biopic about Magnus ‘Hirschfeld (1868-1935), pio- neer of the German homosexual emancipation movement, was made by Rosa von Praunheim, a pioneer of German gay liberation cinema. ‘ 7 ‘Director Rosa von Praunheim was born Holger Mischwitzky in Riga, Latvia, moved to the Praunheim district of Frankfurt and took the name Rosa to remind people of the pink triangle homosexuals wore in concentration camps. Von Praunheim shot the first gay lib- eration film of the second wave movement: It Is Not the Homosexual Who Is Perverse, But'the Situation in Which He Lives (1971). He has gone on to make numerous films about -homosexuality, older women, AIDS, and transvestism, notably I Am My Own Woman, about the East German transvestite Charlotte von Mahlsdorf. Hirschfeld founded the Scientific Humanitarian Committee, the first homosexual It seems appropriate that the emancipation organization in the world, in 1897. He edited the first scientific journal of homosexuali- ty, the Journal of Sexual Intermediaries, and established the Institute of Sexual Science in 1919. He even made a cameo appearance in the first positive film about homosexuality, Diflerent from the Others (1919). The Einstein of Sex fol.- lows Hirschfeld’s life from his childhood, when he is fascinated by animals copulating on the beach, through his university days, when he objects to the accepted pathologization of homosexuals. The suicide of a _ homosexual army officer he had turned away and news of the Oscar Wilde trials (the second of which resulted in a prison term for the author for being a practic- ing homosexual) prompt him to write an apology for homosexual- ity, Sappho and Socrates, but this move also alienates his aunt and uncle, who had supported him financially. Pioneer in a Perverse Situation Pioneering emaneipator Magnus Hirschfeld’s centticted personality is portrayed in Rosa von Praunheim’s.1999 biopic “The Einstein of Sex” Hirschfeld finds a some- times ally in Adolf Brand, editor of the journal Der Eigene (The Special), who leads a circle of * - men and boys who practice nud- , ism and have a cult of male beau- ty based on Classical models. Hirschfeld finds help and support along the way in his relationships with three significant figures: a young baron who eventually flees to Italy to escape blackmail; Dorchen, a transgender woman who botches her self~perfoi-med sex change and becomes Hirschfeld’s maid; and Karl Giese, a young disciple who defends Hirschfeld when he is physically attacked. Karl becomes Hirschfeld’s first real lover, and he is crushed that he cannot accompany Hirschfeld on his tour to America and the Far East. Instead he remains behind to defend the Institute in an increasingly hostile Germany. Hirschfeld never returns to Germany, dying abroad after his beloved Institute is sacked by Nazis. ' Unlike most of von Praunheim’s radical fihns, this one is a straightforward narrative and historically accurate. (A con- cise scholarly account of Hirschfeld’s life can be found in James Steakley’s classic Homosexual Emancipation Movement in Germany [Arno Press, 1975]. A more literary description of Hirschfeld’s milieu appears in Christopher Isherwood’s Christopher and his Kind. The visit to Berlin that led to Isherwood’s The Berlin Stories and then Cabaret was really prompted by asearch for boys. Isherwood even stayed at Hirschfeld’s Institute, which must have become a kind of an interna- tional intellectual andcultural center for homosexuals). Von Praunheim shows not only the landmarks in Hirschfeld’s professional life, but also the many conflicts he encountered along the way. Private/public: while urging many homosexuals to live their lives openly, Hirschfeld himself was celibate through much of his life so as not to jeopardize his public efforts towards legalization and acceptance of homosexuality. Masculine/feminine: Hirschfeld’s theory of homosexuals as a third sex intermediary between man and woman was rejected by Brand and others, who called it "swishy" and "too efifeminate." . And finally, Nazi/Jew: Hirschfeld’s Jewish background was a potential liability for the movement as German anti- - Semitism blossomed. On one hand the movement could be rejected simply because its leader was Jewish; on the other hand attacks on Hirschfeld’s Institute by the Nazis could be written off as anti-Semitic rather than anti- homosexual by potential allies. Even outing as a political tactic is raised in the film, as it was in Hirschfeld’s actual life: his par-_ ticipation in the Eulenberg scan- dal (in which a number of aristo- crats were “outed”) was a politi- cal blunder it took years to recov- er from. _ In spite of this serious historical material, von * Praunheim’s film is not without its queer kitsch value and its sense of humor. The acting, as one might expect from a low- budget film with many personnel debuts, is sometimes less than compelling. The seriousness of occasional documentary footage is leavened by perhaps more scenes than needed of Brand’s band of young nudists frolicking in nature with beach balls or pos- ing in museums amo_ng Classical nude statues. Of course this all is historically accurate. The two camp poles of humor are Hirschfeld’s conserva- tive aunt, who covers her eyes when she visits her nephew’s office so as not to see his collec- tion of phallic objects, and Dorchen, the ballsy transgender maid, who in one scene demon- strates the use of one of these objects — a pedal-operated mov- ing dildo. I The objects themselves are amusing, especially the giant phallus made from an elephant’s tusk and the 18th Century Asian masturbation box Hirschfeld him- self is caught using in one scene. But it is Dorchen who in a penul- timate scene steals the show: when the Nazi youth ransack the Institute and _beat her erstwhile rival Karl, she returns and lets her hair down to give them a classic tongue—lashing that cows even the Nazis into retreat. Hell hath no fury like a transgender maid in the Institute of Sexual Science! The final scene of the film is the ultimate irony, but again historically accurate: Hirschfeld learned of the destruc- tion of his lifelong dream, the Institute for Sexual Science, from a newsreel he saw in a Paris ‘movie theater. Many readers may not realize that the pictures of Nazi book-bumings shown the world over featured Hirschfeld’s library, which was the Nazis’ first target. Hirschfeld died shortly thereafter, unable to establish a new Institute in France. His lover Karl committed suicide in 1938. Dorchen’s fate is unknown. Von Praunheim’s loving homage to the pioneer of sex research and homosexual emanci- pation is definitely worth watch- ing, both entertaining and inform- ative. Magnus Hirschfeld should be remembered, and Rosa von Praunheim’s film makes him memorable. V Kevin Moss teaches at Middlebuijy College and pursues non-academic interests in Montreal. Haynes 00nt'd fro revious page . and balance; his job, in part, was to make shocking what — for most people today ..— is no longer so. For the few dramatic out- bursts that occur to resonate, everything else had to be muted. The dialogue — restricted almost entirely to stock movie lingo — is all about what isn’t said. The actors were forced to do a lot with very lit- tle, and they all succeed beautifully. Indeed, Far From Heaven is performances are as stunning as its cinematography. Perhaps because of the film’s emotional subtlety, at the screening 1 attended a row of young women behind me were decidedly less impressed than I was. “It was depressing, boring, and noth- ings. ing happens,” they huffed as the closing credits rolled. I guess we all have our own definition of “nothing,” though it is true Hayhes’s films hardly have blockbuster pacing,-and — unlike even Sirk — he doesn’t promise requisite happy Hollywood end- bility. If it does, Far From Heaven is an ideal follow-up meal. If it doesn’t, at least Lord of the Rings has our own Sir Ian to recommend it. V Ernie McLeod lives and writes in Middlebury — and sometimes in Montreal. If you missed Far From Heaven in the theaters, rent All That Heaven Allows and see if it whets your gay sensi-