' ‘ »~,.»a-_.mt=..;‘...;:.;- lspeaking 1'ruth to Power Some of you who’ve been in Vermont awhile may remember Terje Anderson, once upon a time an editor of OITM, a community liai- son to the Governor’s office, an , executive director of VT CARES, and a Democratic Party activist. He is now the executive director of the National Association of People With AIDS. Terje made the news in a recent edition of P02, firing off an email castigating the-Human Rights Campaign and the Aids Action Council for kissing up to "absti- nence only" Bush appointees to the Presidential Advisory Council on HIV and AIDS (PACHA). Among» other stands the Council members profess: names reporting and mandatory testing, and opposition to providing condoms or clean needles.‘ . Seems that a coalition of AIDS groups issued a failing grade to Mr. Bush's administration on AIDS actions. After all, 59 percent of people with HIV are still untreat- ed, and the budget underfunds the Ryan White CARE Act and the UN Global Fund to Fight AIDS. Not only did the HRC and AAC.try to substi- tute something “less confrontation- al,” attempt to.stall the report. and finally remove their support from a planned press conference and letter to the president, but the day after the press conference, they threw an exclusive cocktail party for the Bush appointees. Andersen blasted the organizations’ sabotage of the unit- ed-front presentation of the press conference and letter and their delaying tactics: “Being frozen in inaction when the administration is pursuing deadly AIDS policies is not ‘an appropriate strategy," Terje wrote. “My T cells continue to fall and I simply don’t have time for playing games with the lives of my friends and myself." HRC officials said they preferred a softer approach that would not close off lines of commu- nication and shut down “relation- ships that we have built up with congressional Republicans.” Tiptoeing around people who would just as soon walk all over us somehow doesn’t seem like an effective approach. And there's Terje, speaking truth to power within the “community” and beyond it. Healthy Workplace? The Vermont Psychological Association wants to promote “psy- chologically healthy workplaces," so it is giving an award to employers whose workplaces qualify. The crite- ria include “employee involvement, family support, employee growth and development, and health and safety." And yes, support for diversi- ty is among the sub-criteria. So, Charlie, tell the folks what the award-winning businesses get: “featured in the media, promot- ed in company internal and/or exter- nal communications vehicles, hon- ored at special awards events, rec- ognized by community leaders." Wow! Surely, psychological health is its own reward. The cover letter accompa- nying the award brochure was signed by Jan Trepanier, executive director of the Vermont Psychological Association. A trepanier would be a person (one hopes medically quali- fied) who drills holes in the skull, a procedure that in the Middle Ages was considered a cure for physical and mental illness that gained new disciples in the 1960s as a-means of achieving enlightenment. undermining Marriage There was an interesting piece in the May issue of Atlantic Monthly, an essay on how conservatives working to prevent the legalization of same-gender marriage are undermining their own stated goal of “protecting” marriage. The argu- ment goes something like this: you can‘t force gays and lesbians back into the closet and you can't stem the tide of increasing acceptance of gays and lesbians; gays and les- bians, by being out singly and in couples, have legitimized and made '‘cool” the concept of unmarried partnership, making that option more attractive to heterosexuals than the bonds of wedlock. “Homosexua|s," writes author Jonathan Rauch, “are plead- ing to move beyond cohabitation. And who is telling us to just shack up instead? Self-styled friends of matrimony." The conclusion? If conser- vatives really want to defend mar- riage, they should embrace the extension of real marriage (and not just “marriage-light" or “ABM — any- thing but marriage") to gay and les- bian couples. Where The Gays and Lesbians Are _ According to an analysis of census data, the ten most popular cities for gay male couples to live are San Francisco; Miami/Ft. Lauderdale; Santa Fe, N.M.; Atlanta; San Diego; Orlando, Fla.; Los Angeles; Seattle; Austin, Texas; and Portland, Maine. Lesbians prefer Santa Fe, N.M.; Burlington, Vt.; Portland, Maine; Springfield, Mass.; San Francisco/Oakland; Corvallis, Ore.; Madison, Wis.; Albuquerque, N.M.; Eugene, Ore.; and Iowa City, Iowa. The theory is that lesbians prefer smaller urban areas because they are more likely to have children and housing is likely to be less expensive and more available there. So, let's hear it from the lesbians: We’re number two, we’re number twoll Tell Me 'lwice Apparently the Barre-Montpelier Times—Argus didn't think running an op-ed piece bashing Bill Lippert for his "gay agenda" once wasn’t enough. Just in case anyone didn't get it the first time in their weekend edition, they ran the piece by Barre resident David J. Tolassi again on the following Monday (April 22). Using the tactic of taking comments out of context, Tolassi compiled a list of gay “agenda” items he says Bill Lippert is appro- priating his tax dollars to support. When questioned by Lippert and by Virginia Renfrew, the powers that be at the Times—Argus insisted that they ran it again because in some copies of the origi- nal printing, there was an unfortu- nate ink splotch in the middle of the article. Perhaps there was a little gay genie in that machine over the weekend. Fem. of the Year One of my favorite moderately butch gay guys sent an incredulous email in May, announcing that he had been nominated for “Fem. of the Year“ at Middlebury College, where he is a staff member. Yes, the spelling and the punctuation are important. It turned out that the award was not about a propensity to wear dresses and swing a mean purse, but about advancing the cause of feminism. Ahh! The light dawns. The Feminist of the Year Award Ceremony is sponsored by the Women's and Gender Studies Program and Chellis House. Previously called “Women of the Year," the name was changed in order to include guys like my friend Jim: “any person, male or female, who has made outstanding contri- butions to the status of women and /or issues of gender equity in the Middlebury College community dur- ing the past year." _ The winners: students Nahal Batmanghelidj and Kristen Gray; staff members Sharon Van Wright and Yvette Feig; and faculty Amy Elman. Too bad, Jim, better luck next year. Un-‘Dean’-served Praise? Does it bother anyone else that the politician who did least to advance . the cause of civil unions without actively opposing them is now being feted and awarded by GLBTQ groups all over the United States for his “courageous” action, his “leader- ship," his “pro-civil rights" stand? This is the governor whose total public utterances consisted of “No comment; let the Court decide.” The governor who so desired not to be associated with the bill becoming law that he signed the bill “in the closet" — without photographers or supporters in attendance, without handing out souvenir pens or shak- ing hands, unlike virtually every other bill he has ever signed. This is the governor who twisted arms to keep the medical marijuana bill — which would benefit people with HIV, various cancers, MS. and other debilitating diseases — from becom- ing law. Dean has been greeted with standing ovations by GLBTQ audiences and organizations in California, Washington DC, Rochester NY and elsewhere. In September, he shares the honored speakers bill with NPR (and WHYY) interviewer Terry Gross at the National Lesbian and Gay Journalists Association conference in Philadelphia. I sure hope some- one is asking him the hard ques- tions when he says — as he did in Rochester at the Empire State Pride Agenda dinner on May 4 - "The most important act in the LGBT community is the act which is so dif- ficult — to stand up and say, I am who I am and I demand to be accepted for who I am." V